The pianist Andrea Bacchetti (not his rugby playing namesake) met Luciano Berio when he was around 11 and worked, studied, and played music with him until Berio's death in 2003. Bacchetti had recorded Berio piano works under the composer?s supervision - still a reference recording (sound-issues notwithstanding) and recently re-issued in some markets as part of Decca's 3-CD "Luciano Berio, A Portrait" set. It was Berio, too, who suggested Bacchetti mix Bach and his works for a program which the pianist still uses regularly in recital.

I didn't know all that when I interviewed him some time last year, but my first question to him, via e-mail, through his manager, and a translation program, was on the topic of Berio, because his Berio disc seemed to jibe quite well with his more recent Bach CDs on the Dynamic label. So I asked him - feeling quite clever about the question - what, if any, the symmetries between Bach and Berio are?
Incidentally getting answers out of Mr. Bacchetti wasn't all that easy. Because he doesn't trust even his decent German or basic English to get his exact (and exacting) ideas about music across, he answers in Italian. He and his manager - not an Italian speaker either - went back and forth with qualifications, questions, and additions until an English version stood that somewhat resembled the melodic Italian original. Then followed a little more back and forth between the three of us, to really tease out maximum sense and authenticity from the final answers. Eventually we got to this and the following answers, occasionally de-clarified and obfuscated in response to follow-up questions, all heavily edited in this process, yet hopefully precise. So, back to those Bach-Berio symmetries:

Certainly the structural aspect, the common constructive design, where Berio uses only a few notes, a small nucleus, from which arises then, almost suddenly, a big form. So on the one hand you have the intellect, and on the other the opposite: emotion. Berio invents an ascetic language, in a way he creates an 'electronic' keyboard. Bach, at least when writing for the keyboard, invents an 'illuminated' keyboard that leaves the interpreter to express affection and emotion, but guided by the intellect. Both draw geometric lines, but in both cases they are characterized by divine (if you wish) inspiration. And another factor is that the music in both cases is more modern than any other music written at the time. Both are very much forward looking composers: Bach, sometimes, to dodecaphonic music; Berio, more often, towards noise; a downright hatred for consonance.

Bach and 12-tone music?

Well, he didn't consciously work toward the dissolution of key-relationship, of course. But he contributed by way of modulation. Listen to the Gigues of the Fifth and Sixth English Suite, for example, the fugue of the G minor Toccata or the F minor Three Part Invention, or the twenty-fifth Goldberg Variation. You will find 'harmonically demanded' dissonance there. The merging of the intertwining contrapuntal lines and harmonic tension gets to a point where it requires a language that, even to our ears, more than three hundred years later, resembles hints of atonality.

Andrea Bacchetti met Herbert von Karajan at the Salzburg Festival. He was introduced through friends at the Festspielhaus where young Bacchetti got to sit in on rehearsals, and they kept in touch for the three last years that Karajan still lived. Not having compared Bacchetti?s year of birth (1977) and that of Karajan's death (1989), I didn't think about how young Bacchetti must have been? which might in part explain this na´ve question: "How different might your career have been, had Herbert von Karajan lived another year or so?"

To be honest, I don't know. Probably not much if it had only been a year since I was only nine when I first met him. In any case it was a very good experience. Karajan listened to me very carefully, made good suggestions, all in perfect Italian, and he showed great affection. He told my parents that I was an enormous talent and that it wasn't just a duty for him to teach talented young people like me, but also a pleasure. That said, even as a child I never had any illusions. I always knew that the journey of a musician would be very difficult, very demanding, and fatiguing. Now, if I had met Karajan when I was 20 years old, that would have been an opportunity to make an enormous difference. But as it is I take away wonderful memories - above all having him talk to me about Mozart, Bach, Beethoven. He explained his ideas very simply, directly, especially given he was talking to a nine-year old. And I still remember his advice. I always had great esteem for Karajan, even if it is currently popular to belittle his importance. I liked the simplicity, his earnestness, and - yes - humility with which he approached music. At our last meeting before his death he told my parents: 'If I live, we?ll do great things.' Alas...

Do you find a spiritual dimension to Bach? Perhaps a cleansing of sorts, that inoculates against the occasional madness of the world outside?

L.Berio, Piano Works,


J.S.Bach, Toccatas,


J.S.Bach, Two-Part
Inventions & Sinfonias,



J.S.Bach, Goldberg

ArthausMusik DVD

B.Galuppi, Piano Sonatas,


L.Cherubini, 6 Sonatas,


I always look for that spiritual dimension in the Bach I play, as I do in all his music. I think particularly of that abstraction expressed in the writing which suggests an absoluteness of the music, an incompatibility with any form of materialism. That's what introduces a certain dose of mysticism to the Sarabandes or the Allemandes and a certain 'aristocratic brusqueness' in the Courantes and in the Gigues.

Would you agree that the Toccatas, among the least recorded of Bach's prominent works for solo keybord, are less attractive, less 'sexy' than, say, the French Suites?

I wouldn't know how to answer that precisely. As far as Bach is concerned, I'm not sure if I am even interested in that aspect. What I seek is unity of line, I look for rhythm, color, those little effects, the independence of the lines. Be it in the Toccatas, the Suites, or the Concertos. Maybe the Toccatas strike as slightly more improvisatory - typical for toccatas and typical for organ works - with those long recitatives that prepare the way for the closing fugues. In some places they strike me as demonic (consider the G minor Toccata, BWV 915). Or take the long introductions in all the Toccatas, except for BWV 916 which doesn't have an introduction at all. They recall the art of spontaneous improvisation, very common in Bach's time, typical for the great composer, and typical of interpreters at the time.

Is the same true for Two-Part Inventions? And was the relative scarcity of recordings part of the reason you chose to make exactly those works the subject of your two first Bach recordings for Dynamic, rather than recording the umpteenth version of the Goldberg Variations or the Italian Concerto?

Yes, I chose the Inventions and the Toccatas because the catalogues aren't bulging with recordings of them yet." (Here, Bacchetti kindly brushes over my having missed the fact that he actually has recorded the Goldberg Variations on DVD and CD.) "The Inventions might seem like works for kids or students, but given their actual difficulty, even for adults, I think we can learn much from them about the so-called 'difficultly of the seemingly easy'. They are small masterpieces, gems, like unique and beautiful paintings. And the same is true for the Toccatas. Another reason to pick the Inventions is my desire to build an entire Bach cycle. For several years I have been adding a new 'book' from the great Cantor's keyboard works towards that goal. After having tackled the English and the French Suites, the Goldberg Variations, the Inventions, now it was time for the Toccatas. I don't so much see them as disparate pieces but as a large body united by an invisible thread arranged along ascending chromatic and diatonic tonalities... as if they were a small version of the Well Tempered Clavier.

How did you first encounter Baldassare Galuppi [he has recorded several Galuppi sonatas for RCA]; what did you think and feel when you studied and recorded his sonatas? Are there many more gems waiting for us in his output and do you have a continued interest in his sonatas?

I encountered many of the Galuppi sonatas by studying the autograph sources in the library of the Levi Foundation in Venice. I had been attracted to his music ever since I heard Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli's recording of the C-major Sonata as a child. Unfortunately that one I didn't find among the manuscripts. While studying the autographs, I was principally attracted to a few reoccurring characteristics in Galuppi: the brilliant virtuosity, the lyricism, the 'theater of colors' he can get out of the modern instrument, especially through refined use of the pedaling... which, if used with extreme tact, allows you to tease out great amounts from inside the score. That particularly applies to Galuppi, but really to all music, especially baroque music on a modern instrument. I feel it inside me, where and how to use it; often unconsciously, which is when my musical instinct guides me. It 'an expression that comes from within, from the musical thought, from the heart. The sonatas of Galuppi, some more than others, lend themselves to this use which, however personal in expression, arise from the interpreter's relationship with the text and how he feels "inside" the thought, the "voice" of the composer. Which all by way of saying that I am very happy that Dynamic and I are planning to record more of the Italian composers of the 17th and 18th centuries, and that the next CD will be devoted to the unpublished sonatas, all drawn from the manuscripts, of Benedetto Marcello, another Venetian genius of the 17th century whose work for keyboard is, until now, completely unknown.

On a superficial first listening to the eight sonatas you on the RCA disc, Galuppi comes across as containing Bachian implicity, occasionally Mozartean lightness, and Scarlattiesque wit and playfulness... What virtues and qualities do you see in these sonatas?

I agree with that. I believe those are precisely the virtues of Galuppi's keyboard works. I think it was a great privilege to rediscover these works and to get to present a careful selection of these sonatas, a good variety that hopes to do justice to the originality and beauty of his compositions. And there are still a lot of interesting sonatas left of his that I'd like to perform and record? maybe at some point in the future. I seem to remember that Mozart, on his Italian journey as a child prodigy, met Galuppi when he passed through Venice. In fact, the Sonata in G Major [track 1 on the RCA disc] is directly quoted in the famous aria "Pupille Amate" from Le Nozze di Figaro. There is no trace of Bachian counterpoint, but the A minor Sonata contains references to Palestrina, with an archaic sense thanks to its almost embarrassingly obvious attempt of modal construction. Sometimes the flow of two voices in the slow movements approaches the dances in the Suites of Bach or even some of the Inventions - if only slightly and, I think, not consciously.

Posted in Bach, Interviews
discuss trackback
| permalink